<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog</link>
	<description>Exegetical Insights for Bible Students</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:04:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Paul&#8217;s Disputes with the Jews by Should Believers Debate? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=358&#038;cpage=1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Believers Debate? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=358#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] some objections come to mind. These include Jude’s exhortation to “contend for the faith,” Paul’s “disputings” with the Jews throughout his ministry, and clear cases of confrontation (as when Paul rebukes Elymas the sorcer). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some objections come to mind. These include Jude’s exhortation to “contend for the faith,” Paul’s “disputings” with the Jews throughout his ministry, and clear cases of confrontation (as when Paul rebukes Elymas the sorcer). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Believers Debate? by Paul&#8217;s Disputes with the Jews &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=342&#038;cpage=1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul&#8217;s Disputes with the Jews &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 13:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=342#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] instruction to Timothy (2 Tim 2:24) not to &#8220;strive&#8221; in conducting his teaching seems to run against his own example in Acts. Let&#8217;s consider two sets of passages, marked by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] instruction to Timothy (2 Tim 2:24) not to &#8220;strive&#8221; in conducting his teaching seems to run against his own example in Acts. Let&#8217;s consider two sets of passages, marked by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How should we &#8220;Contend for the Faith&#8221;? by Should Believers Debate? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=352&#038;cpage=1#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Believers Debate? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=352#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] Insights for Bible Students      &#171; &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; How do we &#8220;Contend for the Faith&#8221;? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Insights for Bible Students      &laquo; &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; How do we &#8220;Contend for the Faith&#8221;? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Should Believers Debate? by How do we &#8220;Contend for the Faith&#8221;? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=342&#038;cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>How do we &#8220;Contend for the Faith&#8221;? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 11:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=342#comment-96</guid>
		<description>[...] Cyber-Chapel Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &#171; Should Believers Debate? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cyber-Chapel Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &laquo; Should Believers Debate? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Have you eaten your Bible today? by &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=324#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] notion of Scripture as food lends new insight to the description of teaching as &#8220;sound&#8221; or &#8220;wholesome&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] notion of Scripture as food lends new insight to the description of teaching as &#8220;sound&#8221; or &#8220;wholesome&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Have you eaten your Bible today? by How Shepherds Feed the Flock &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=324&#038;cpage=1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>How Shepherds Feed the Flock &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 20:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=324#comment-93</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &#171; Have you eaten your Bible today? &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &laquo; Have you eaten your Bible today? &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8220;Sound Doctrine&#8221; and &#8220;Health Food&#8221; by Have you eaten your Bible today? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=334&#038;cpage=1#comment-92</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you eaten your Bible today? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=334#comment-92</guid>
		<description>[...] teachers in assemblies of the saints, how this metaphor explains the meaning of the phrase  “sound doctrine,” and  the “spiritual physiology” by which spiritual food leads to spiritual [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] teachers in assemblies of the saints, how this metaphor explains the meaning of the phrase  “sound doctrine,” and  the “spiritual physiology” by which spiritual food leads to spiritual [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Shepherds Feed the Flock by Have you eaten your Bible today? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=328&#038;cpage=1#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you eaten your Bible today? &#171; Cyber-Chapel Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 12:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=328#comment-91</guid>
		<description>[...] Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &#171; Do You Know Jesus? How Shepherds Feed the Flock [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Blog Exegetical Insights for Bible Students      &laquo; Do You Know Jesus? How Shepherds Feed the Flock [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God is Irresponsible by van</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=282&#038;cpage=1#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>van</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=282#comment-88</guid>
		<description>If you think about the texts that use the עלל  word family of people, I think you&#039;ll agree that it has a moral &quot;edge&quot; that &quot;autonomous&quot; is lacking. By using the term of himself, God is emphasizing the difference between what he can do and what people are allowed to do. There is a sterility in &quot;autonomous&quot; that I don&#039;t think fits the human contexts. It may be more comfortable to us theologically, but I suspect that part of what lies behind God&#039;s choice here is precisely the desire for a shock effect, to wake us up to his distinctive nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think about the texts that use the עלל  word family of people, I think you&#8217;ll agree that it has a moral &#8220;edge&#8221; that &#8220;autonomous&#8221; is lacking. By using the term of himself, God is emphasizing the difference between what he can do and what people are allowed to do. There is a sterility in &#8220;autonomous&#8221; that I don&#8217;t think fits the human contexts. It may be more comfortable to us theologically, but I suspect that part of what lies behind God&#8217;s choice here is precisely the desire for a shock effect, to wake us up to his distinctive nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on God is Haughty by Glenn Fink</title>
		<link>http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=289&#038;cpage=1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 05:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cyber-chapel.org/blog/?p=289#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Van,

For this description of both men and God, I think the English words &quot;sovereign&quot; and &quot;sovereignty&quot; fit both meanings.  It is good and right for God to be reckoned sovereign.  It is wrong and foolish for man to consider himself sovereign, except over things where God has given him rule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Van,</p>
<p>For this description of both men and God, I think the English words &#8220;sovereign&#8221; and &#8220;sovereignty&#8221; fit both meanings.  It is good and right for God to be reckoned sovereign.  It is wrong and foolish for man to consider himself sovereign, except over things where God has given him rule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

